Research Projects - Expert Council on Integration and Migration gGmbH

The Integration Barometer is a representative public survey of people with and without a migration background in Germany. It measures the integration climate in Germany as an immigration country and captures the population’s perceptions and expectations regarding integration and migration as well as integration and migration policy. The 2022 Integration Barometer was jointly sponsored for the second time by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community and the 16 federal states (Laender). It enables analyses at the federal and state level.

The Ministry of Social Affairs, Youth, Family, Senior Citizens, Integration and Equality of Schleswig-Holsteinhas again commissioned the Expert Council's scientific staff with a special analysis of the SVR's 2022 Integration Barometer. To this end, the available data for Schleswig-Holstein are analysed and presented in detail. The analysis focuses on the social, cultural and identificational dimensions of integration and on the Integration Climate Index. These aspects are analysed using descriptive and multivariate statistical techniques. Furthermore, comparisons with the values at the national level and with the findings of the SVR Integration Barometer 2020 are planned.

The Integration Barometer is a representative public survey of people with and without a migration background in Germany. It measures the integration climate in Germany as an immigration country and captures the population’s perceptions and expectations regarding integration and migration as well as integration and migration policy. The 2022 Integration Barometer was jointly sponsored for the second time by the Federal Ministry of the Interior and Community and the 16 federal states (Laender). It enables analyses at the federal and state level.

The Saxon State Ministry of Social Affairs & Cohesion (SMS) of the State of Saxony has again commissioned the Expert Council's scientific staff with a special analysis of the SVR's 2022 Integration Barometer. To this end, the available data for Saxony are analysed and presented in detail. The analysis focuses on the social, cultural and identificational dimensions of integration and on the Integration Climate Index. These aspects are analysed using descriptive and multivariate statistical techniques. Furthermore, comparisons with the values at the national level and with the findings of the SVR Integration Barometer 2018 are planned.

The Integration Barometer is a representative public survey of people with and without a migration background in Germany. It measures the integration climate in Germany as an immigration country and captures the population’s perceptions and expectations regarding integration and migration as well as integration and migration policy. The 2024 Integration Barometer was jointly sponsored for the third time by the Federal Ministry of the Interior and Community and the 16 federal states (Laender). It enables analyses at the federal and state level.

The Saxon State Ministry of Social Affairs & Cohesion (SMS) of the State of Saxony has again commissioned the Expert Council's scientific staff with a special analysis of the SVR's 2024 Integration Barometer. To this end, the available data for Saxony were analysed and presented in detail. The analysis focused on the social, cultural and identificational dimensions of integration and on the Integration Climate Index. These aspects were analysed using descriptive and multivariate statistical techniques. Furthermore, comparisons with the values at the national level and with the findings of the SVR Integration Barometer 2022 were planned.

The UNHCR estimates that across the world, several million people are stateless. According to the German Federal Statistical Office, about 28,000 people in Germany in 2021 had no official nationality and are consequently recognised as stateless. The nationality of another 95,000 people is defined as “undetermined”. However, aside from these parameters, little is known about statelessness and undetermined nationality in Germany.

The aim of the project is therefore to produce a detailed report on the phenomenon of statelessness in Germany. It is intended as an explorative, empirical investigation of the contextual factors for statelessness and undetermined nationality, using a variety of data sources. First, socio-demographic data from the Ausländerzentralregister will be used to create an initial, systematic overview of both groups. The second phase of the investigation will examine the administrative processes that are used in relation to stateless people and those whose nationality is undetermined, with the aim of identifying good practice that can be applied to different situations.

The research project is intended to heighten public and political awareness of statelessness in Germany; particularly in the context of the current reform of Germany’s citizenship law. Finally, the project will ask whether and to what extent it might be possible to undertake more detailed empirical research on the topic, especially in the form of a follow-up study with its own quantitative survey carried out with stateless people and people with undetermined nationality.

Initial findings have been published in the form of a policy brief in the first quarter of 2023, while a more comprehensive study is planned for 2024. The research project is funded by the Robert Bosch Stiftung.

Policy Brief

Living without a passport: The situation of stateless people in Germany

Contact

Maximilian Müller
Researcher
Tel +49 30. 288 86 59 – 14
mmueller@svr-migration.de

Prejudices and stereotypes pose a threat to social cohesion in an immigration society, which is why such attitudes are problematic across all social milieus. Prejudicial actions by the security authorities can have particularly serious consequences: The term applied to the police deeming a person to be suspicious merely on account of their ethnic origin, for instance, and then conducting an ID check is “racial profiling”. That kind of discrimination constitutes a violation of Article 3 (3) of the German Basic Law (Grundgesetz, GG) and of the General Act on Equal Treatment (Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz, AGG). People who are subjected to ethnically-biased ID checks can suffer serious mental health consequences, for instance. The debate around racial profiling has been very controversial in recent years. As yet, though, there are hardly any empirically verified findings concerning the extent of racial profiling in Germany.

This is the first project to investigate racial profiling on a broad database. Data collected for the SVR Integration Barometer on self-assessed phenotypical differences, among others, will be compared with data on how often and where the police stop and check people. The key question is whether people who state that they are perceived as phenotypically different are stopped and checked without cause, and thus discriminated against, more frequently.

The project results were published in a policy brief.

Policy Brief (Summary)

Police stops and racial profiling. Evidence from the SVR Integration Barometer.

The scientific staff of the SVR is using the ongoing reform of Germany’s Nationality Act (Staatsangehörigkeitsgesetz, StAG) as an opportunity to investigate attitudes in the resident German population to naturalisation and the proposed reforms. To that end, quantitative data will be gathered using a combination of two survey methods: The first module will use a representative multi-topic survey to record attitudes to naturalisation requirements; the second module will use an online access panel to conduct a vignette study, amongst other things, that will aim to show whether and how respondents weight the varying individual characteristics of hypothetical candidates for naturalisation before deciding who they would grant German nationality to.

The project aims to provide an up-to-date picture of current attitudes to this important social and integration policy issue – and thus to contribute to the ongoing debate on the reform of the law on nationality – as well as to record which preferences around and reservations against naturalisation exist in the resident German population.

Policy Brief (Summary)

New Pathways, New Hurdles? The Reform of Citizenship Law and Potential Consequences for Authorities and Vulnerable Groups

With its decision of 4 March 2022, the Council has for the first time triggered Directive 2001/55/EC on temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons. Temporary protection initially applies for two years and will be extended for a further year (until 2025) by a new Council decision - but not beyond that (Article 4 of the Directive). It is therefore necessary to consider the regulations that might apply and the options available after 3 March 2025. This date is not far off, and both Germany and the EU need to be prepared in terms of refugee and residence law and sociopolitical policy.

Set against various scenarios for the ongoing war, the policy brief aims to identify options for residence law and refugee policy at the German and European level. The policy brief will also consider foreign and European policy issues relating to future relations with Ukraine, as well as the challenges of integration policy and residence law within a national framework. Account will also be taken of relevant experiences with civil war refugees or those with toleration status following the Yugoslav wars in the 1990s. The aim is to present policy options at national and European level that consider different war scenarios and the interests of different actors.

The results of the project were published in a study in January 2024.

Study (Summary)

Permanent residence, return or circular mobility? Options for Ukrainian war refugees after temporary protection

The Integration Barometer is a representative public survey of people with and without a migration background in Germany. It measures the integration climate in Germany as an immigration country and captures the population’s perceptions and expectations regarding integration and migration as well as integration and migration policy. The 2022 Integration Barometer was jointly sponsored for the second time by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community and the 16 federal states (Laender). It enables analyses at the federal and state level.

The Ministry for Family, Women, Culture and Integration (MFFKI) of the State of Rhineland-Palatinate has again commissioned the Expert Council's scientific staff with a special analysis of the SVR's 2022 Integration Barometer. To this end, the available data for Rhineland-Palatinate are analysed and presented in detail. The analysis focuses on the social, cultural and identificational dimensions of integration and on the Integration Climate Index. These aspects are analysed using descriptive and multivariate statistical techniques. Furthermore, comparisons with the values at the national level and with the findings of the SVR Integration Barometer 2020 are planned.

Antisemitism on the one hand and Islamophobia, or antimuslim hostility, on the other have been the subject of both public and political debate for many years. The issue has gained relevance, as criminal offences motivated by antisemitic and antimuslim attitudes have recently increased (once more). The key to peaceful social coexistence, however, is that no group is systematically excluded or even threatened. Islamophobic and antisemitic attitudes in Germany’s overall population have been relatively well researched. Representative surveys tend to show that Islamophobic and antimuslim attitudes are slightly more widespread than antisemitism. The attitudes of, specifically, people with a migration background to Judaism and Islam have been studied to a lesser degree, though. Knowledge about these attitudes within the various groups of migrants and religious groups in Germany is needed to better understand intergroup relations as a whole in an immigration society and, based on that, to recognise what policy action is necessary.

The objective of the project is to investigate the scale and spread of antisemitic and Islamophobic, or antimuslim, attitudes among people with a migration background based on the SVR’s 2020 Integration Barometer. The Integration Barometer provides a representative picture of these attitudes both at the level of origin group and in relation to the religious affiliation of those surveyed. The project also investigates whether and to what extent antisemitism and Islamophobia are linked to migration-specific and socio-demographic features.

The results of the project were published in a study in October 2022.

Study (Summary)

Anti-Muslim and anti-Semitic attitudes in an immigration country - (not) an exceptional case?

Today, many migrant umbrella organisations lobby policy-makers and the administration both at regional and at national level, representing, for instance, political, social or cultural and religious interests of people with a migration background. Since the 2000s, the federal government has also increasingly acknowledged these organisations’ inputs to integration policy. The fact that, for instance, migrant umbrella organisations are being increasingly incorporated into political dialogue forums at federal level (e.g. the Integration Summit), give concrete expression to this development. At the same time, knowledge about the landscape of migrant umbrella organisations in Germany is still very limited. The same goes for how their role and function in integration policy has evolved.

The research project follows from a previous study entitled “Migrant Organisations as Partners of Politics and Civil Society”, conducted between 2018 and 2020 by the then Expert Council’s Research Unit. Building on this previous overview of the size, diversity and structure of migrant organisations across the whole of Germany, the new research project aims at systematically addressing current research gaps on migrant umbrella organisations active at the national level. One focus will lay on their potentials for political representation and their chances of bringing their influence to bear in political processes.

A policy brief was published in November 2022. It will be followed by a broader-based research project in 2024.

Study (Summary)

‘Who’s in charge here?’ Federal associations of migrant organisations: a navigation aid

Policy Brief (Summary)

Seeking a partner? The state and migrant umbrella organisations in integration policy

The Integration Barometer is a representative public survey of people with and without a migration background in Germany. It measures the integration climate in Germany as an immigration country and captures the population's perceptions and expectations with regard to integration and migration as well as integration and migration policy. The 2020 Integration Barometer was the first to be sponsored jointly by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community and the 16 federal states (Laender). The Integration Barometer has been expanded into a Federal Government/Federal State Barometer, which enables analyses to be made at the federal state level too.

The Office of Employment, Health, Social Affairs, Family and Integration of the Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg has commissioned a special analysis on SVR's 2020 Integration Barometer from SVR's scientific staff. The data for Hamburg will be analysed in detail and compared with the findings for 2018. In particular, the analysis will consider indicators of social integration (frequency of contact, perceived discrimination), cultural integration (knowledge of German) and identificational integration (feeling of belonging to Germany/local community, etc.). A further focus will be on surveying and evaluating changes in the integration climate. The special analysis is due to be delivered to the City State of Hamburg in the first half of 2022.

Contact
Maximilian Müller
Researcher
Tel +49 30. 288 86 59 – 14
mmueller@svr-migration.de

This research project of the SVR Research Unit has been developed in the context of more recent refugee migration patterns towards Germany. It will focus on the perspective of the (“receiving”) population, in particular its willingness to support refugees and the underlying motivational factors that result in engagement. On the one hand, the project asks to what extent different motivations to volunteer are linked to a willingness to help (Ukrainian) refugees. On the other hand, it also asks how the willingness to help refugees from Ukraine differs from attitudes towards refugees from parts of the world that are culturally and geographically further removed, such as Syria or Nigeria.

Based on a longitudinal online survey of adults in Germany, the study aims to identify new findings in relation to the attitudes and engagement of a “receiving population”. This in turn will be used as the basis for developing strategies and practical approaches that can be used by those implementing integration policies, to promote engagement in civil society and embed long-term solidarity with refugees more effectively.

A policy brief was published in July 2023, a study in April 2024. The research project is funded by the Stiftung Mercator.

Study (Summary)
The motives and motivation of volunteers in refugee assistance. Results of a survey on volunteer work

Policy Brief (Summary)
Selective Solidarity? What makes people willing to help refugees.

Germany’s federal states have wide scope when it comes to drafting legislation on integration policy. Over the past 10 years, five of them have used this leeway to adopt laws on integration and participation, two of which have already undergone wide-ranging reform. Other federal states are in the process of drafting such legislation. The federal government’s coalition agreement makes provision for a participation act for more representation and participation. Against this backdrop, the SVR’s scientific staff, working on behalf of the Federal Ministry of the Interior and Community, updated a policy brief on integration policy legislation at the federal state level that was first published in 2017. A comparison of the applicable regulations in Berlin, North Rhine-Westphalia, Baden-Württemberg, Bavaria and Schleswig-Holstein shows that laws on integration and participation can not only give integration policy a symbolic boost, but can also have a steering effect, because they both enshrine basic principles in law and establish or strengthen coordination and cooperation structures. Their effectiveness is determined by both how they have been drafted and how they are implemented. From its analysis of federal state legislation the study also extrapolates ideas for the planned federal act on integration and participation.

The study was published in November 2022 and is available as an accessible PDF file.

Study (Summary)

Integration legislation at the federal state level: An updated review – and lessons learnt for the federal government

A large proportion of the foreigners who entered Germany seeking protection in 2015 and 2016 will soon have fulfilled the minimum period of residency required by law as a major criterion for naturalisation in Germany. In this context it is important to note that those seeking protection are more inclined than EU citizens or other third-country nationals to seek citizenship. Excluding the impact of special factors, such as Brexit or a processing backlog due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the annual number of applications for naturalisation has remained largely unchanged at around 110,000 for a number of years. It can therefore be assumed that the number of applications for naturalisation will pick up in the next few years. This is likely to be the case regardless of the reform of citizenship law planned by the new German government, which has the potential in the short term to greatly increase the number of people eligible for naturalisation.

The project includes an assessment of the number of applications for naturalisation that may be anticipated in the near future based on overall refugee numbers, those with recognition status and the periods of residence of people from different countries of origin. The results of the project were published in a policy brief in the first half of 2022.

Publication

Policy Brief (Summary)

Refugees as new citizens – the potential in the coming years

The Integration Barometer is a representative public survey of people with and without a migration background in Germany. It measures the integration climate in Germany as an immigration country and captures the population's perceptions and expectations with regard to integration and migration as well as integration and migration policy. The 2020 Integration Barometer was the first to be sponsored jointly by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community and the 16 federal states (Laender). The Integration Barometer has been expanded into a Federal Government/Federal State Barometer, which enables analyses to be made at the federal state level too.

The Ministry for Family, Women, Culture and Integration (MFFKI) of the State of Rhineland-Palatinate has commissioned SVR's scientific staff with a special analysis of SVR's 2020 Integration Barometer. The data for Rhineland-Palatinate were analysed and presented in detail. The analysis focused on the social, cultural and identificational dimensions of integration, trust in institutions and the media and on the Integration Climate Index. These aspects were analysed using descriptive and multivariate statistical techniques. The special analysis was handed over to the State of Rhineland-Palatinate end of February 2022.

The Federal Government Commissioner for Migration, Refugees, and Integration has commissioned the Expert Council’s scientific staff to conduct an expert assessment of good practice standards for naturalization campaigns on the state and local level. The report will develop quality criteria for naturalization campaigns and naturalization practice by analysing naturalization campaigns, general measures designed to increase naturalization activity, and forms of administrative organisation, in select local authorities and federal states which have significantly increased their naturalization figures over a long-term period and are thereby well-suited to serve as examples of good practice for other local authorities and states. We will use this analysis as the foundation for a series of recommendations for action for local authorities, state governments, and the German Federal Government with regard to supporting and encouraging naturalization in Germany.

In the course of the project the SVR will cooperate with the Federal Statistical Office (Destatis) and the relevant authorities of the federal states and use data from naturalization statistics and the Central Register of Foreigners (Ausländerzentralregister, or AZR) to calculate the so-called ‘exploited naturalization potential’ (ausgeschöpftes Einbürgerungspotenzial, or aEP) on the level of municipal authorities. The aEP reflects the number of naturalizations in relation to the number of foreigners who have been resident in Germany for at least 10 years, and thereby gives a more reliable sense of foreigners’ interest in acquiring German citizenship than the mere naturalization rate. The Federal Statistical Office has already been recording and publishing the aEP on the state level for several years. Yet there is a need for more detailed data on naturalizations on the level of the administrative districts and municipalities within the states, especially given that municipal and local authorities are generally responsible for processing and deciding upon naturalization applications.

The results of the project were published by the Federal Government Commissioner for Migration, Refugees, and Integration, (in German) and were presented to the public in an event at the beginning of June 2021.

Media consumption patterns provide diverse insights into the life of people with a migration background in Germany. Based on these insights, it is not only possible to see, for instance, where and in what language this heterogeneous group meets its demand for information and whether there are differences compared to population groups without a migration background. This is because media use also correlates with a number of factors which are analysed when studying integration, including language skills, cultural integration and political leanings.

The SVR’s 2020 Integration Barometer provides the opportunity to depict the diversity of users’ current media behaviour, including their consumption of social media, (online) magazines/newspapers, and (online) TV. This enables an analysis of the extent to which the current media preferences of people with a migration background are linked to socio-demographic and migration-specific factors. Further, thanks to the large case numbers, possible differences between groups of origin can be investigated with regard to aspects which are otherwise related, such as trust in German media or trust in media in their country of origin.

The results of the research project were published in a Policy Brief in August 2021. The SVR’s 2020 Integration Barometer was the first to be funded jointly by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community and the German federal states.

Follow this link to find out more about the Integration Barometer.

Publication

Policy Brief (Summary)

Tuned in? How people with a migration background in Germany use and trust the media

The flip side of highly skilled and skilled migration, which tends to go along with above-average wages and salaries, is precarious economic migration in the low-wage sector. As the coronavirus pandemic has most recently shown, those sectors and professions for which low pay and precarious employment conditions are typical are crucial to a well-functioning society and viable economy. At the same time, these are often jobs which only require qualifications below those of a skilled worker. Foreign workers are significantly over-represented in Germany’s low-paid industries, in particular in the following sectors: transport and logistics, food and hospitality, cleaning services, construction, and agriculture. Precarious employment often goes hand in hand with precarious opportunities for participation. This is due, on the one hand, to the forms of employment found in this area (e.g. temporary agency work, contracts for work and services, seasonal work and posting), to the rules on access and residence rights which are linked to that employment, and to real-life working conditions. On the other hand, certain forms of economic migration – which are often initially only meant to be temporary – call for an alternative understanding of integration, which does not always lead to permanent residence and ultimately to “full membership” following naturalisation and to participation in all key areas of life.

The aim of this research project is to systematically investigate the obstacles to and opportunities for participation of newly arrived EU and third-country workers in the low-wage sector and then to show how these obstacles can be overcome. Based on statistical, legal and empirical analyses and selected sector-specific case studies, the project will elaborate the normative and practical significance of the participation of precariously employed foreign workers and link this with courses of action for politics, business and civil society.

The project comprises a total of five modules, including a number of publications as well as involving and networking with stakeholders, practitioners and, in particular, representatives from politics, business/labour market, civil society and science. The research project is sponsored by Stiftung Mercator and runs from 1 April 2021 to 30 September 2023. A first publication has been released in August 2022, and two more in 2023.

Contact
Dr Holger Kolb
Head of Annual Report Unit & Deputy Managing Director of the SVR
Tel +49 30. 288 86 59 – 16
kolb@svr-migration.de

Dr Franziska Loschert
Researcher
Tel +49 30. 288 86 59 – 34
loschert@svr-migration.de

Franziska Schork
Researcher
Tel +49 30. 288 86 59 – 34
schork@svr-migration.de

More than 4.5 million ethnic Aussiedler or repatriated ethnic Germans have come to Germany since 1950, especially from the states of the former Soviet Union, from Poland and Romania. Whilst Aussiedler formed the subject of an increasing amount of research on migration and integration in Germany in the 1990s and early 2000s, this interest seems to have waned significantly over the past decade. There are currently very few up-to-date, comprehensive studies on the topic.

That is why the Expert Council on Integration and Migration (SVR), in cooperation with the Research Centre at the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF), is investigating their current level of integration and participation. Besides structural indicators of participation, the study aims to investigate attitudes, convictions and opinions in this population group which are relevant to coexistence and social cohesion in Germany.

The analysis is based on data collected as part of the SVR Integration Barometer, specifically in 2018 and 2020, including numerous aspects relating to social, cultural and identificational integration. The large case numbers surveyed permit an analysis of Aussiedler as a separate demographic. This will be supplemented by an analysis conducted by the BAMF’s Research Centre of migration and micro census data which above all relate to structural aspects of integration such as education and labour market participation, as well as an analysis of research literature published over the last 10 years.

The results of the project were published in a study in spring 2022. The research project was co-funded through a grant from the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees. The project ran from October 2020 to May 2022.

Publication

Study (Summary)

Successful integration? The lifeworlds and social participation of ethnic Aussiedler

Refugees studying at German higher education institutions face diverse obstacles which block their access to the local labour market. Some of them are the same as those faced by other international students, but oftentimes bigger, for example as regards the right to stay in Germany. The extent to which refugees are thus able to access the labour market is therefore highly dependent on the support they receive from higher education institutions and other local organisations. The German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) has developed two programmes – Integration of Refugees into Higher Education (INTEGRA) and Promoting the Professional Integration of Academics with a Refugee Background Into the German Labour Market (PROFI) – which are aimed at helping to prepare refugees for their study programmes and find employment after they graduate. Both programmes are funded by Germany’s Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

The accompanying study conducted by the Expert Council on Integration and Migration (SVR) analyses the effectiveness of the programme strategies when it comes to facilitating refugee students’ access to the German labour market. The goal is to describe success factors and to develop recommendations for higher education policy-makers and practitioners.

The accompanying study was conducted on behalf of the DAAD. The expert report was published in November 2021.

Publication

Expert Report (Summary)

Refugee Integration and Skilled Migration: A New Role for German Universities?

The situation in the refugee camps on the Greek islands has been disastrous long before the threat of a COVID 19 pandemic and the fire at the Moria refugee camp in September 2020. Calls from policymakers and civil society to evacuate the camps – which the European Union designated as hotspots in 2015 – have been growing.

Despite considerable financial resources and personnel support from EU agencies in receiving and registering asylum seekers arriving on the islands, efficient asylum procedures remain elusive and reception and accommodation standards in the hotspots are extremely poor. Seemingly 'obvious' solutions – such as transfers to mainland Greece or other member states – have so far had little effect.

The project "Closing Moria?" examines the factors that are causing the situation in the Greek hotspots and that stand in the way of attempts to resolve it. To this end, the paper analyses aspects of Greek and European asylum policy, among others. The new EU Pact on Migration and Asylum, which was presented by the European Commission on 23 September 2020, emphasises border procedures and accelerated asylum processing as central elements of European asylum policy. An analysis of the Greek hotspots and their structural and implementation challenges is thus all the more relevant with regard to the further development of European asylum policy. The project is based on literature research, policy documents and expert interviews. Research results were published in March 2021 in the form of a policy brief in German and English.

Publication

Policy Brief

“No more Morias”? Origins, challenges and prospects of the hotspots on the Greek islands

Of all the various areas of participation which are particularly relevant to integration policy – for instance education and training, the labour market, housing and health – it is political participation and other areas of social participation which have so far been largely ignored by research. Questions raised include: Do migrants feel they are well represented within the political system in Germany? Do they trust its various institutions? And are they politically/socially active?

The SVR Research Unit’s project will be looking at key determinants in regard to an understanding of and trust in politics, political action/participation and social engagement by evaluating relevant items in the 2018 and 2020 SVR Integration Barometers. Account will be taken of different groups of origin (including in comparison to those without a migration background), gender differences, migrant generations, regional specifics and socio-demographic background variables.

The planned study is part of the “BePart – Political Participation Starts at the Local Level!” project for which Minor – Projektkontor für Bildung und Forschung has lead responsibility. “BePart” is supported by the Federal Government Commissioner for Migration, Refugees and Integration and the Federal Agency for Civic Education. Research results were published in March 2021.

Publication

Study (Summary)

Part of the game or just onlookers? Political participation and civil engagement among people in Germany with migrations backgrounds

Between 2015 and 2016, more than 2.2 million teenagers and young adults migrated to or within the European Union. Given their oftentimes interrupted education, access to schools and vocational training programs is crucial for these 16- to 25-year-olds.

In this research project, The Expert Council’s Research Unit compares the educational opportunities of young refugees and other newly-migrated 15- to 24-year-olds in selected member states of the European Union. The research focusses on (barriers to) access to secondary and post-secondary education as well as salient pathways and support services for newcomers.

The two-year project was funded by Stiftung Mercator. Initial findings were published in January 2020 in a policy brief. The final study was published in German in November 2020, the English version of the final report was published in December 2020.

Publications

Policy Brief

A matter of luck? Newcomers and their access to vocational education and training in Germany

Study

Out of the maze. Easing the path to vocational education and training for young newcomers in Europe

Immigrant organisations are important civil society actors in Germany. Their remit and their understanding of themselves now go well beyond merely supporting their ‟own” community. In the course of ongoing social and political changes this extremely heterogeneous organizational landscape is changing, too. New kinds of organisation are emerging due to the arrival of new migrants, and there is also a trend towards forming umbrella organisations and new types of immigrant organisations. However, there are serious gaps in research on the quantitative importance of these organisations, how they differ and what determines their approach to integration.

The SVR Research Unitʼs two-year study project aims to help close these research gaps. Its objectives are, first, to provide a quantitative overview of existing organisations and, second, to conduct a qualitative analysis of the changing landscape and the associated opportunities and risks. The goal is to draw up recommendations for action for policymakers, administration, interest groups and civil society, especially when it comes to optimising funding structures for immigrant organisations.

The project was sponsored by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community. Research results were published in December 2020.

Publication

Study (Summary)

Diverse activities – broad networks – partial integration? Migrants' organisations as a creative force in society

The transition from primary to secondary school is an exciting time for most pupils. Some, though, will feel apprehensive about starting a new school because they are afraid of failure and of not being accepted. Pupils with a migration background and those with a difficult social background are especially prone to such fears. Their lack of trust in themselves and others can lead to a significant drop in performance. However, starting a new school can also be a great chance for a fresh start and to establish trusting relationships between teachers and pupils.

This transitional phase thus presents teachers with opportunities to effectively lay the foundations so as to ensure that new pupils feel they belong and are motivated to actively take part in lessons throughout their time at school, despite the occasional set-back.

Teaching strategies to help strengthen pupilsʼ motivation are being developed and evaluated as part of a research/practical project and will then form part of a toolkit which will eventually be used in teacher training and further training. One item in the toolkit is the ‟self-affirmation intervention”, a method first tested in the United States which has been adapted to the German school system. The research project was funded by Stiftung Mercator.

Publication

Study (Summary)

Empowering students! How teachers can use wise interventions to encourage good performance

The current public debate revolves around terms such as ‟trust”, ‟cohesion” and ‟participation”. ‟Politics” and ‟democracy” are deemed to be in crisis, and there is a general feeling that politicians are disengaged from voters. Many people (with and without a migration background) are at a loss to understand the political issues of the day and ask themselves things like ‟Do I actually understand important political issues?” and ‟Do I feel that politicians are really interested in me and what matters to me?” How, then, do citizens rate their ‟political self-efficacy” – and what does that mean in terms of their getting involved in politics and trusting the democratic system? Among other things, the 2018 Integration Barometer asked people with and without a migration background about their political literacy and how they perceive their means of political influence. Their answers have been assessed as part of a cooperation project with the German Centre for Integration and Migration Research (DeZIM Institute). The project provided a means of comparing those with and without a migration background as well as in-depth findings on specific groups of origin.

The cooperation project was sponsored by the German Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth (BMFSFJ). The SVR Research Unit and the DeZIM Institute published the project results in a joint Policy Brief in April 2019.

Publications

Summary

In touch with politics? How people with and without a migration background perceive their political self-efficacy

“Legal migration for work and training: Mobility options to Europe for those not in need of protection” is a project of the Research Unit of the Expert Council of German Foundations on Integration and Migration in cooperation with the Migration Policy Institute Europe, funded by Stiftung Mercator. Given large-scale irregular migration flows to Europe, the central question is what legal alternatives do and could exist for third-country nationals who are not in need of protection and who move for education, training and or work. Through a combination of five country case studies (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden) and analysis of the European Union’s external migration policy, the project explores existing legal migration options, challenges in policy design and implementation, and reflects on the options for the development of effective legal migration policies and programmes.

Project results were made available in a series of shorter publications between December 2018 and June 2019. The final study was published in English in October 2019. The German version of the final report was launched on 20 November 2019.

project description

Publications

Study

Legal migration for work and training: Mobility options to Europe for those not in need of protection

Country Case Studies

Country case study France (by Yves Pascouau and Christophe Pouly)

Country case study Germany (by SVR's Research Unit)

Country case study Italy (by Roberta Perna)

Country case study Spain (by MPI Europe)

Country case study Sweden (by Delmi / Bernd Parusel)

Further publications

Can the European Union deliver feasible options for legal migration? Contradictions between rhetoric, limited competence and national interests (by SVR's Research Unit)

Seasonal Worker Programmes in Europe: Promising Practices and Ongoing Challenges (by MPI Europe)

In a democratic system, going to the ballot box is not the only form of political participation, but it is certainly the most important. While many scientific studies have in the past looked at the party preferences of the population as a whole, the voting tendencies of migrants have not been sufficiently researched to date. More than 19 million people with a migration background live in Germany. At the 2017 elections to the Bundestag the proportion of people with a migration background who were eligible to vote rose to 10.2 per cent – from 9.4 per cent back in 2013. Voters with a migration background are of major significance for democracy in Germany and will in future have an ever greater role to play in shaping the countryʼs political landscape.

The project aimed to analyse the basic party orientations of people with a migration background based on the SVR’s Integration Barometer and to examine these with a view to future demographically driven shifts within the voter structure.

The first analysis drawing on data in the SVRʼs 2016 Integration Barometer was published in November 2016. Publication was supported by the Federal Government Commissioner for Migration, Refugees and Integration as part of the Year of Participation. A second analysis based on data from the SVRʼs 2018 Integration Barometer, in which a comparison could to be drawn between the two surveys, was published in September 2018 (only available in German).

Publications

Summary

Black, Red, Green. What are the Party Preferences of Immigrants?

In Germany, a growing number of universities is affected by general demographic decline and the ensuing drop in domestic students. At the same time, the number of international students is on the rise, totalling more than 280,000 in 2018, or 10 percent of the country’s student population.

In this project, SVR’s Research Unit took a closer look at universities which are already experiencing a decline in their domestic student intake, many of which are located in shrinking communities. By analyzing how these universities recruit and prepare international students, this project aimed to assess the stabilizing capabilities of select internationalization practices. Since the number of shrinking communities – and, as a likely result, the number of shrinking universities – is projected to increase across Germany, this project aspired to shed light on how universities and higher education systems can increase the effectiveness of international student recruitment and improve their academic success.

The research project was funded by Germany’s Federal Ministry of Education and Research. The results were published in March 2019.

Study

Countering demographic decline – How Germany’s shrinking universities attract and retain international students

Currently, less than 1 percent of the more than 17 million cross-border refugees worldwide are resettled every year, whereby they attain permanent protection by a third country. In Germany, a permanent resettlement programme has been in place since 2011, offering a safe route to Germany for several hundred people every year. In order to establish a common European policy, the European Commission submitted a proposal for an EU resettlement framework in July 2016. And in 2018, Germany will co-chair the international Annual Tripartite Consultations on Resettlement. In addition, the UN General Assembly is slated to adopt the Global Compact on Refugees.

In view of these developments and the increasingly important role of Germany in the debates on the further development of the European and international refugee protection system, the SVR Research Unit was examining the recent developments and most important challenges of the current resettlement policy at the German, European and international levels. In consideration of document analyses and background interviews, the Research Unit has developed policy options and recommendations for action that are directed primarily at decision-makers in politics and administration but also at civil society actors.

The project was funded by Stiftung Mercator. The results were published in June 2018 in the form of a policy brief.

Publication

Policy Brief

What Next for Global Refugee Policy? Opportunities and Limits of Resettlement at Global, European and National Levels

Subjectively perceived discrimination based on origin is a significant indicator of equal participation in an immigration society. Earlier findings for Germany show that migrants from Arabic-speaking regions of origin and Turkey report more often about perceived disadvantages than do people who immigrated from, for example, Eastern Europe. For Germany, it remains unclear whether and to what extent migrants’ perceptions of discrimination, which differ depending on their group of origin, are related to a physical appearance that suggests that they may have immigrated. For example, do people who are associated with a migration background due to their skin colour or a headscarf feel more discriminated against? This question was investigated on the basis of the SVR 2016 Integration Barometer.

The project was funded by Stiftung Mercator. The results were published in January 2018.

Publications

Summary

“So, where are you originally from?” Experiences of discrimination and phenotypic differences in Germany

Since 2010, Berlin, North Rhine-Westphalia, Baden-Württemberg and finally Bavaria have each passed legislation on integration at the federal state level (Land level). In other Länder, legislation of this kind has been called for, announced or discussed. The contents of the individual laws are different, but what many of them have in common is that they establish institutions and processes to formulate and implement integration policy at Land and municipal level. This includes regulations on integration commissioners and advisory councils as well as cooperation and coordination structures between Land and municipalities, participation opportunities for people with a migration background as well as guidelines for government authorities.

The research project analysed and compared the existing laws and aimed to answer the question of whether integration laws are a useful instrument to more effectively manage integration and participation policy.

The project was funded by the Stiftung Mercator. The results were published as a Policy Brief in October 2017.

Publications

Summary

Paper Tigers or Milestones? A Comparison of the Integration Acts of the Bundesländer

The German school system is facing an extraordinary challenge in integrating well over 100,000 children and teenagers who have sought asylum since the summer of 2015. Despite the remarkable efforts of teachers, school administrators, and policy-makers, many young refugees are unable to access a nearby school within the three months set forth by European Union law.

Once in school, refugees are often taught in separate classrooms first in order to help them achieve a basic command of the German language before joining their peers in the general education classroom. While this practice has been criticized for hampering academic progress and the social integration of refugees, proponents point to the necessity of ‘safe spaces’ where students can learn the language and adjust to their new environment.

To find out more about the pros and cons of different instructional models for refugees, the Expert Council’s Research Unit set out to conduct field research in five of the country's 16 states (Länder): Baden-Württemberg, Berlin, Hesse, Hamburg and North Rhine-Westphalia. The exploratory project sought to shed light on the plethora of instructional models currently in use to teach refugees. Furthermore, the Research Unit planned to investigate instances of in-school segregation and teachers' experiences with the newly arrived students.

The project was funded by Stiftung Mercator. The results were published in March 2018.

Publications

Summary

Dead End Schools? Refugees at Segregated Schools in Germany

First- and second-generation migrants account for one in four students at German universities today. Apart from tens of thousands of ‘educational nomads’ who are drawn to Germany every year because of its study programs, ethnic diversity is largely home-grown as more and more second-generation migrants flock to the country’s universities and universities of applied sciences. However, despite notable interest from policy-makers and higher education leaders, very little is known about the experiences and day-to-day challenges of different groups of migrant students.

Recent studies have shown that migrants in Germany are not only less likely to attend higher education, they are also more likely to drop out of study programmes. In order to find out more, the Expert Council’s Research Unit set out to analyse the educational experiences of migrant students. Based on the analysis, (policy) recommendations were developed, aiming to improve the educational opportunities of first- and second-generation migrants in Germany.

The project was funded by Germany’s Federal Ministry of Education and Research. The results were published in May 2017.

Summary

Tackling the Diversity Challenge. Ethnic Diversity and Student Success in the German Higher Education System

Infographics

Student Diversity in the German Higher Education System 2015
Obstacles to Degree Completion for International Students and First- and Second-Generation Migrants
Analytical Potential of Selected Datasets with Regard to Investigating Student Success in the German Higher Education System

Due to the drastic increase in the number of refugees in Germany over the last few years, the absolute number of people obliged to leave Germany has also risen. It is therefore to be expected that the municipal immigration offices (Ausländerbehörden) will be increasingly faced with the task of organising and carrying out departures – be it deportations or support and financing for assisted voluntary departures.

The goal of the project was to outline the different approaches to terminating residence using examples from three federal states (Länder) and to look at how they are carried out by the municipal immigration offices. One particular focus was the question of the importance attached to assisted voluntary departure or deportation, and how both options can be incorporated into concrete policy for terminating residence – for example, as a strategy at federal or Land level or for practical implementation by the municipal immigration offices in municipalities or districts. Special emphasis was placed on what is known as assisted voluntary departure which is generally considered the more "humane" and inexpensive variant of return. The study thus also aimed to contribute to bringing more objectivity to the public debate.

The research project was funded by the Stiftung Mercator. The results were published in March 2017.

Publications

Summary

Return Policy in Germany. Ways to Strengthen Financed Voluntary Departure

As a result of the rising number of refugees in Germany, policymakers, government authorities and civil society are confronted with the challenge of streamlining reception processes, providing adequate living conditions and encouraging social integration. But one voice is usually missing in the debates – the voice of the refugees themselves. Reliable information about their living situations, however, is urgently needed not only to tailor the asylum and reception system to meet their needs, but also to reshape the opportunities for social participation and de-emotionalise the public debate.

The aim of the research project was therefore a scientifically based description of the current living situations of refugees in Germany from their own perspective. In qualitative interviews in several federal states (Laender), insights were collected on the needs and expectations of the refugees, what resources they bring with them and how they perceive their current living situation as well as their health and well-being. The study focuses on people with an uncertain residence status who have recently arrived in Germany. Based on the findings, recommendations for how to improve refugee reception and integration were developed that are relevant for policymakers at the federal, state and local levels as well as for government and civil society actors engaged in work with refugees on the ground.

The study was conducted by the Expert Council's Research Unit and the Robert Bosch Stiftung. The results were published in November 2017.

Publications

Summary

How might integration succeed? Asylum seekers about their life situations and participation perspectives in Germany

At local level, the increase in the influx of refugees is linked, on the one hand, to short-term financial burdens and, on the other, to medium- and long-term opportunities. In terms of integration policy, the question arises as to how the refugees are distributed throughout Germany. Particularly in rural areas in eastern Germany, many refugees, once their status is recognised, move to large cities like Berlin, Düsseldorf or Hamburg where many of their compatriots have already formed communities.

The research project aimed, on the one hand, to gain insight into the challenges that emerge at municipal and county level when refugees move from their original location. On the other hand, it aimed to analyse the general conditions under which – despite some considerable structural weaknesses in the labour market and infrastructure – integration efforts lead recognised refugees to make their homes in the communities. To this end, available data was evaluated in an exploratory study and policy management options and practices were analysed at state and county level, taking into account the residence requirements as outlined in the new integration law.

The project was funded by Stiftung Mercator. The results were published in November 2016.

Publications

Summary

Arriving and Staying in Germany: Facilitating Integration by Assigning Place of Residence?

How do international students experience their post-study job search in Germany? How do these experiences differ from their initial expectations? And what are the effects of these experiences on former students’ intentions to stay in or leave Germany?

The two-year research project featured the first-ever longitudinal analysis of the study-to-work transition of international students in Germany. Students were surveyed toward the end of their studies and 18 months later, i.e. the maximum duration of Germany’s post-study job search visa (Section 16 subs. 4 Residence Act). This way, the Expert Council’s Research Unit seeked to compare international students’ attitudes and expectations toward finding employment in Germany with their actual post-study experiences. Furthermore, migration patterns both in and outside of Germany were analysed.

The project was funded by Stifterverband and Stiftung Mercator. The results were published in December of 2017.

Publications

Study – Summary

From lecture hall to landing a job. International students starting their careers in Germany

Policy Brief – Summary

One Step Ahead. International Students Improve Professional Opportunities through Practical Experience

In Germany, immigrant students’ school performance continues to lag behind their native counterparts’ performance. Part of this gap has been attributed to low teacher expectations and discriminating classroom practices. However, in the case of Germany, these hypotheses are yet to be tested empirically. Consequently, it is still unclear which instructional practices and policy measures are most effective in helping immigrant students succeed.

To address these knowledge gaps, the Expert Council’s Research Unit and the Berlin Institute for Integration and Migration Research (BIM) at Humboldt University conduct a mixed methods research project which investigates teachers’ diversity-related attitudes, student-teacher interaction and its effects on academic success. As a first deliverable, the project will develop self-affirming teacher classroom practices which can be used to address stereotype threat in various settings. The impact of these affirmative practices will then be tested as part of an experimental study at select German schools.

The research project was funded by Stiftung Mercator. The findings were published in July 2017.

Publications

Summary

Diversity in the Classroom. How Teachers Can Encourage Good Performance

Schools are among the most important institutions for supporting the integration of immigrants and their families. However, many schools are under financial pressure as they attempt to close achievement gaps and provide effective support to high-need students—including second-language learners and recent immigrants, as well as low-income students and other vulnerable groups. In Germany, only a handful Länder employ a data-driven approach when it comes to providing extra resources to schools which enroll a high share of language learners and low-income students.

This research project seeks to systematically assess methods of supplementary school funding in the 16 Länder as well as select jurisdictions in Canada, France and the United States.

The research is conducted in partnership with the Migration Policy Institute (MPI). The project was funded by the Stiftung Mercator. The results were be published in early 2016.

Publications

Summary

Funding for Impact? Immigrant Students and Supplementary School Funding in Germany

Study

Improving Education for Migrant-Background Students: A Transatlantic Comparison of School Funding

International migration doesn't just affect one single country. The international migration of labour in particular affects the countries of origin and destination in a variety of different ways. The international laws that govern migration, however, – unlike other global issues like trade or climate change and with the exception of the international refugee regime – are a patchwork quilt at best. The reluctance of governments to enter into multilateral treaties on migration is evident, e.g. in the very low ratification rate of the UN Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers from 1990: until now, not a single destination country in Western Europe or North America has ratified this treaty. In the meantime, the debate about migration and how to deal with it, particularly in the context of "migration and development", has been rapidly gaining momentum since the turn of the century.

The milestones in this debate include the Global Commission for International Migration appointed by the UN (2003-2005), the High Level Dialogue on Migration and Development (2006/2013), the Global Forum on Migration and Development (GFMD) which has convened annually since 2007, the inter-agency Global Migration Group (GMG) as well as various initiatives of relevant international organisations. Germany is increasingly active in global migration policy; this is clearly evidenced, among other things, in its assumption of the role of co-chair of the 2017/18 Global Forum on Migration and Development together with Morocco.

The research project thus aimed to illustrate the rapidly changing global governance of migration and the role of Germany in this process. It undertook an analysis of the actors, forums and interests involved to create more transparency and ultimately provide policy recommendations.

The research project was initiated by the Bertelsmann Stiftung and the Expert Council's Research Unit and was funded by the Bertelsmann Stiftung. The Bertelsmann Stiftung has increased its focus on issues related to fair migration management around the world and awarded the 2015 Reinhard Mohn Prize to Prof. Rita Süssmuth. The results of the research project were published in the spring of 2016.

Publications

Summary

Global Migration Governance: Germany as an Architect of International Migration Policy

Since 2011, the civil war in Syria has led to huge numbers of displaced people and refugees. According to the United Nations, Syria is now the biggest humanitarian crisis since 1945. Syria’s neighbouring countries have admitted 4 million refugees on their territory. In contrast, only a small number of Syrians has found protection in Europe or other industrialised countries.

So far, Germany is one of the few countries which have accepted Syrian refugees in significant numbers in addition to its regular asylum system. Since 2013, three federal programmes have been launched, granting temporary protection to 20,000 people. In addition, 15 out of the 16 Länder governments have introduced programmes for family members (admission through private sponsors). A big advantage of Germany’s admission programmes is that they offer a save and legal entry to Germany whereas asylum seekers are in most cases forced to embark on the illegal and dangerous trip via the Mediterranean Sea. At the same time, Germany’s admission programmes show notable difference in terms of their conditions of access as well as the rights and obligations for relatives in Germany.

This research project features a comparative analysis of Germany’s humanitarian admission programmes. In doing so, the project seeks to contribute to future developments of humanitarian admission programmes in Germany and beyond. The research encompasses the analysis of documents and official statistical data, as well as expert interviews.

The project was funded by the Stiftung Mercator. The results were published in the fall of 2015.

Publications

Summary

Safe Access. The Humanitarian Admission Programmes for Syrian Refugees in Germany

When it comes to attracting skilled foreign labour, international students are increasingly seen as ‘model immigrants’: They are well-trained, their credentials are fully recognized and many of them are already familiar with the language and culture of their host country.

Recent studies show that many international students need additional support to successfully enter the labour markets of their respective host country. In theory, student support services such as international offices and career services are well-positioned to assist international students in their transition. In reality, however, very little is known about whether these service units actually adjust their support to the needs of international students, and to what extent they collaborate with local employers and government agencies. To find out more, the SVR Research Unit will conduct the first-ever international mapping of study-to-work related support services in four countries (Canada, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden). By surveying key personnel at public colleges and universities in four countries the SVR Research Unit seeks to identify institutional facilitators in the study-to-work transition as well as the extent to which they collaborate.

The research project was funded by the Stiftung Mercator and the Stifterverband. The results were published in the second quarter of 2015.

The project was carried out in collaboration with the following project partners: the Canadian Bureau for International Education (CBIE), the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), the Career Service Netzwerk Deutschland (CSND), the Netherlands Organisation for International Cooperation in Higher Education (Nuffic) and the Swedish Council for Higher Education (UHR).

Publications

Study

Train and Retain. Career Support for International Students in Canada, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden

In the context of increasing globalisation and transnational migration, the international mobility of Germany’s population has received more attention from policymakers, researchers and the general public. The goal of this research project is to collect accurate information on key motivations of emigrants and returnees that could be used as a basis to develop an effective policy for reducing the loss of skilled labour to emigration. The main component of the project is an international survey of German emigrants and returnees designed to identify the main reasons for which they decide to migrate.

The research project will be carried out in cooperation with the Department for Social Structure Analysis at the University of Duisburg-Essen and the German Federal Institute for Population Research (Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung – BiB).

The research project was funded by the Stiftung Mercator and the cooperating partners. The project findings were published in March 2015.

Publications

Summary

Internationally Mobile. Motivations, Determining Factors and Impacts of the Emigration and Return Migration of German Citizens

The number of people seeking asylum in the European Union is on the rise – and refugees continue to be confronted with widely diverging standards in the individual member states, be it in terms of reception conditions or the asylum procedure itself. Furthermore, the EU is still far from having a common practice for asylum decisions and thus a uniform protection level. So far, no EU-wide mechanism exists to ensure a more even distribution of asylum seekers.

The objective of this joint research project by SVR’s Research Unit and the German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP) was to develop a multi-factor model which is capable of calculating fair refugee reception quotas for every member state based on its economic strength, population, size of territory and unemployment rate.

The project was funded by the Stiftung Mercator. The final results were published in November 2013.

Publications

Policy Brief

European Refugee Policy: Pathways to Fairer Burden-Sharing

To the Point

The European Asylum Crisis: Towards Collective Reception and Fair Quotas

Three in five foreigners in Germany come from a country outside of the EU. Unlike EU citizens who are allowed to vote in local and European elections, these third country nationals are excluded from political decision-making processes.

This project sought to examine to what extent third country nationals are interested in voting in general elections at the federal level and identifies their potential participation in future Bundestag elections based on a special analysis of data from the Immigrant Citizens Survey (ICS) Germany conducted by the SVR Research Unit which surveyed around 1,000 migrants from third countries. Based on the analysis, the SVR Research Unit recommends a stronger push for naturalization and greater emphasis on German citizenship and voting rights.

The project was funded by the Stiftung Mercator. The final results were published in August 2013.

Publications

Summary

New Voters for the Bundestag? Potential Turnout among Third Country Nationals in General Elections

Collaboration between parents and schools needs to increase, but there is still a lack of a shared understanding of what exactly constitutes good cooperative work with parents.

The project sought to come up with a practically-oriented list of criteria for good cooperative work with parents in schools. Schools that have not yet taken an in-depth look at this issue could orient themselves around these standards to structure cooperative work with parents at their schools and effectively integrate this work into their existing structures.

The project was funded by the Vodafone Foundation Germany. The final results were published in March 2014.

Publications

Summary – Study

Parents as Partners in Education: Successful Participation in Primary Schools

Summary – Policy Brief

Immigrant Organisations and Cooperative Work with Parents: Potential, Structural Conditions and Possibilities for Development

Children’s educational success and participation in society are rooted in their early childhood development. Parents, as the people children relate to most, lay the foundation for their children’s educational careers which can create special challenges particularly for migrant parents. Day care centres can give parents a lot of help bringing up their children.

The project aims to identify the function of day care centres and what they can offer in terms of parent education. The project looks at the general access families with a migration background have to institutional day care facilities, what kinds of parental education services day care centres offer and the necessary prerequisites for these services and whether migrant families make use of these services.

The project was funded by the Vodafone Foundation Germany. The final results were published in December 2014.

Publications

Summary – Study

Parents as Partners in Education: Successful Participation in Primary Schools

Summary – Study

Day Care Centres Building Bridges. Interculturally Oriented Parental Education in the Immigration Society

Summary – Policy Brief

Obstacle Course to Day Care. Why Parents with a Migration Background are Less Likely to Send Their Children to Day Care.

Job market discrimination has particularly serious consequences because success or failure also affects the opportunities to participate in other areas of life. By administering a correspondence test (1,794 job training applications) this research project sought to collect data for the first time on the occurrence and scope of discrimination when applying for training positions, including possible causes of and mechanisms for discrimination.

The results should be directly usable for practice: training companies, applicants for training positions, chambers of commerce and industry, chambers of trade, actors in transition management and political decision-makers can all benefit in equal measure.

The research project was funded by the Robert Bosch Stiftung. The results were published in March 2014.

Publications

Summary

Discrimination on the Training Market. Extent, Causes and Recommended Actions

Segregation is no longer a marginal phenomenon at German schools, especially in urban areas. One of its negative consequences is to limit the educational opportunities open to migrant students.

The research project took a critical look at the extent, causes and effects of school segregation in Germany. Based on an in-depth analysis of international student assessment data (PIRLS and TIMSS 2011) and geospatial data for the city of Berlin this project aimed to develop concrete recommendations for reducing the performance gap between migrant students at segregated schools and their native German peers. Rather than overemphasising top-down desegregation measures, both schools and school administration should invest more time and resources in strengthening parent-teacher collaboration, need-based school funding and language instruction across the entire curriculum.

The project was funded by the Stiftung Mercator, which works towards the improvement of educational opportunities. The findings were published in July 2013.

Publications

Summary – Study

School Segregation in Germany. The Extent, the Effects and Recommended Actions for Better Educational Opportunities

Summary – Policy Brief

Segregation at Primary Schools in Germany. The Effect of Parental Choice of School

Although the second generation of Muslim migrants born in Germany is much better integrated than the first generation, the political and media debates are increasingly confined to the ‘failed integration of Muslims’.

Based on an in-depth analysis of SVR’s 2012 Integration Barometer this project sought to assess people’s opinion of how Muslims are portrayed in the German media. Germany's migrant and native population agree that the media image of Muslims in Germany is too negative. The SVR Research Unit recommends increasing the number of articles about Muslims in their regular day-to-day lives outside of the problem contexts.

The project was funded by the Stiftung Mercator. The final results were published in March 2013.

Publications

Summary

Muslims in Germany: Media Portrayal and Everyday Experiences

Within the scope of the “Immigrant Citizens Survey” migrants from outside the European Union were asked about their experiences in the areas of employment, language learning, political participation, residence status, naturalisation and family reunion. The aim of the project was to improve the understanding of integration processes. On the basis of the findings, recommendations were developed for how to better reach integration goals.

The survey was carried out in Germany and six other European countries: Belgium, France, Italy, Portugal, Spain and Hungary. The study was funded by the European Commission, the King Boudouin Foundation (Belgium) and the Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian (Portugal). The project was coordinated by the Migration Policy Group (MPG).

In the case of Germany, personal interviews were conducted with a total of 1,200 migrants from non-EU countries. The findings were published and presented at an international conference in June 2012.

Publications

Study – Summary

German Integration Measures from the Perspective of Non-EU Citizens. The Results of the Immigrant Citizens Survey for Germany

Study

Immigrant Citizens Survey. How Immigrants experience integration in 15 European cities

Obwohl internationale Studierende zunehmend als potenzielle Fachkräfte gelten, ist bislang wenig bekannt über ihre Bleibeabsichten. Ziel des Forschungsprojekts war es, die wichtigsten Einflussfaktoren auf die Bleibeabsichten internationaler Studierender erstmalig international vergleichend zu untersuchen. Kernstück des Vorhabens war eine Online-Befragung unter mehr als 6.000 internationalenStudierenden in fünf ausgewählten EU-Staaten (Deutschland, Schweden, Niederlande, Frankreich, Großbritannien). Das Projekt wurde vom SVR-Forschungsbereich in Zusammenarbeit mit der Migration Policy Group (MPG) durchgeführt. Für jedes der untersuchten Länder wurden zudem akademische und öffentliche Partner einbezogen (für Deutschland z. B. der DAAD).

Das Forschungsprojekt wurde von der Stiftung Mercator gefördert. Die Ergebnisse wurden im Rahmen einer internationalen Fachtagung im April 2012 vorgestellt und veröffentlicht.

Publikationen

Studie

Mobile Talente? Ein Vergleich der Bleibeabsichten internationaler Studierender in fünf Staaten der Europäischen Union

Studie

Vom internationalen Studierenden zum hochqualifizierten Zuwanderer. Ein Vergleich der rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen in fünf Staaten der Europäischen Union

Ongoing Projects with start in

2024

Skilled workers from abroad in day care centres and schools in Germany – Potential and challenges (August 2024 – April 2025)

The new naturalisation ceremonies under the reformed German Citizenship Law (July 2024 – June 2025)

2023

Conditions, opportunities and challenges of the political participation of adolescents and young adults with a migration background (July 2023 – April 2025)

Naturalisation as an ‘integration booster’ for refugees (October 2023 – December 2026)

2022

Transnational networks and civil society activities in the context of forced migration: Afghan and Syrian communities in Germany (February 2022 – June 2025)

Completed Projects with start in

2024

Integration in Schleswig-Holstein. Special analysis of the SVR Integration Barometer 2022 (January 2024 – June 2024)

Integration in Saxony. Special analysis of the SVR Integration Barometer 2022 (February 2024 – June 2024)

Integration in Saxony. Special analysis of the SVR Integration Barometer 2024 (September 2024 – December 2024)

2023

Statelessness in Germany: volume, social demographics and administrative processes (January 2023 – June 2024)

Racial profiling: Empirical findings for Germany (March 2023 – December 2023)

Attitudes to naturalisation. Analyses in the context of the reform of the law on nationality (July 2023 – June 2024)

Scenarios and regulatory options for the period after the expiry of temporary protection for Ukrainian war refugees (June 2023 – January 2024)

Integration in Rhineland-Palatinate. Special analysis of the SVR Integration Barometer 2022 (September 2023 – February 2024)

2022

Antisemitic and antimuslim attitudes in an immigration country (Februar 2022 – Oktober 2022)

Influential and representative? The role of migrant umbrella organisations in integration policy (February 2022 – December 2024)

Integration in Hamburg. Special analysis of SVR’s 2020 Integration Barometer (January 2022 – December 2022)

Solidarity in the Receiving Society: perceptions of refugees and determinants for engagement and willingness to help (January 2022 – May 2024)

Integration legislation at the federal state level: An updated review – and lessons learnt for the federal government (July 2022 – November 2022)

2021

Refugees as new citizens – Challenges and opportunities for the policy and practice of naturalisation in Germany (July 2021 – June 2022)

Integration in Rhineland-Palatinate. Special analysis of SVR’s 2020 Integration Barometer (September 2021 – February 2022)

Expert assessment of municipal naturalization practices (March 2021 – July 2021)

Migrants’ media consumption: Findings from the SVR’s 2020 Integration Barometer (January 2021 – August 2021)

The precarious employment of foreign workers and prospects for their participation in Germany (April 2021 – September 2023)

2020

Analysis of current data on the integration of Aussiedler or repatriated ethnic Germans in Germany (October 2020 – May 2022)

Study to accompany the DAAD’s PROFI and INTEGRA programmes (October 2020 – September 2021)

“Closing Moria?” Why the refugee camps on the Greek islands are not shut down (April 2020 – June 2021)

2019

Political and social participation in countries of immigration: New insights into the representation and participation of people with a migration background living in Germany (June 2019 – June 2021)

Bridging the Access Gap: A Comparison of Educational Opportunities of Young Newcomers in the European Union (January 2019 – December 2020)

2018

Immigrant Organisations – Political and Civil Society Partners (October 2018 – December 2020)

Promoting achievement motivation in the classroom – a toolkit for teacher training (September 2018 – June 2021)

Understanding Politics, Trusting Politicians, Participating in Political Life. The Political Self-Efficacy of People with and without a Migration Background (September 2018 – June 2019)

Legal migration for work and training: Mobility options to Europe for those not in need of protection (January 2018 – March 2021)

Changes at the Ballot Box – An Analysis of the Party Preferences of Immigrants (June 2018 – September 2018)

2017

Internationalization of Universities in Shrinking Communities (December 2017 – March 2019)

What lies ahead for refugee policy? Resettlement in Germany, the European Union and worldwide (August 2017 – June 2018)

Identification with Germany and discriminatory experiences of migrants (January 2017 – January 2018)

Purely Symbolic Policy or a Basis for Effective Participation? The Integration Laws of the Länder (January 2017 – October 2017)

2016

Refugees in the German School System (September 2016 – March 2018)

Struggling with Diversity? German Universities and the Student Experiences of First- and Second-Generation Migrants (November 2016 – June 2017)

Return Policy in Germany: The Concept and Practice of Terminating Residence in Germany (February 2016 – March 2017)

From Arrival to Participation in Society: How Refugees View Their Lives in Germany (February 2016 – December 2017)

Arriving and Staying in Germany: Determining Where Refugees Live (March 2016 – November 2016)

2015

Study and Work – How International Students Experience Their Job Search in Germany (April 2015 – December 2017)

Counteracting Stereotype Threat: Increasing achievement in school by self-affirmation (November 2015 – October 2017)

Immigrant Students and Supplementary School Funding (June 2015 – June 2016)

Follower, Pioneer, Foot-Dragger? The Role of Germany in Global Migration Governance (December 2015 – March 2016)

Humanitarian Admission Programmes for Syrians in Germany (February 2015 – October 2015)

2013

Train and Retain – Career Support for International Students (September 2013 – July 2015)

What Motivates People to Emigrate from and Return to Germany? (May 2013 – April 2015)

European Refugee Policy – Pathways to Fairer Burden Sharing (April 2013 – November 2013)

New Voters for the Bundestag? Potential Turnout among Third Country Nationals in Germany’s General Elect ions (February 2013 – August 2013)

2012

Parent-Teacher Collaboration at School (March 2012 – December 2014)

Parent-Teacher Collaboration in Early Childhood Education (March 2012 – June 2014)

Discrimination on Germany’s Job Training Market (November 2012 – April 2014)

School Segregation in Germany (June 2012 – September 2013)

Muslims in Germany: Media Portrayal and Everyday Experiences (October 2012 – March 2013)

2011

Immigrant Citizens Survey (January 2011 – July 2012)

Value Migration – Bleibeabsichten internationaler Studierender